The worship anthem “How He Loves Us” has resonated with millions, but David Crowder’s version sparked controversy with a lyric change. This article delves into the story behind the song, exploring the original writer’s perspective on the alteration and the broader implications for Christian culture.
The Original “Sloppy Wet Kiss” and Its Meaning
John Mark McMillan, the songwriter behind “How He Loves Us,” penned the line “Heaven meets earth like a sloppy wet kiss.” This evocative phrase, however, wasn’t in David Crowder’s rendition. Crowder, with McMillan’s permission, altered the lyric, recognizing its potential to alienate certain audiences. McMillan addresses this change in a blog post, acknowledging the personal connection many have with the song and expressing respect for Crowder’s decision.
McMillan clarifies the intent behind the original lyric: to depict the beautiful yet messy collision of the heavenly and earthly realms. He uses examples like childbirth and the death of Jesus – events filled with both awe and rawness. The “sloppy wet kiss” wasn’t meant to be taken literally as a kiss with God, but rather a metaphor for the untidy, visceral nature of divine intervention in the human experience.
David Crowder’s Decision and Its Reception
Crowder’s modification, while well-intentioned, ignited debate within Christian communities. Some lamented the alteration of a deeply personal song, while others welcomed a version deemed more appropriate for congregational singing. McMillan acknowledges both viewpoints, understanding the emotional responses to the change.
He emphasizes Crowder’s sensitivity in seeking permission and giving McMillan full credit for the song – a rare occurrence in the music industry, especially with covers. McMillan applauds Crowder for tailoring the song to his audience. However, he also critiques the cultural climate that necessitated the change.
The Bigger Picture: Authenticity in Worship
McMillan questions why a phrase like “sloppy wet kiss” could be considered controversial within Christianity. He challenges the notion of a sanitized faith, advocating for authenticity and embracing the messy realities of life and faith. He urges Christians to shed pretense and embrace genuine connection with God.
McMillan’s reflection on “How He Loves Us” extends beyond a simple lyric change. It prompts a larger conversation about authenticity in worship and the potential for genuine expression to be stifled by cultural expectations. It raises the question: are we more concerned with appearances than with embracing the full spectrum of human experience in our relationship with the divine?
Conclusion: Embracing the Messy and the Beautiful
The story of “How He Loves Us,” in both its original and adapted forms, highlights the complexities of faith and artistic expression. While acknowledging the practical considerations behind Crowder’s decision, McMillan ultimately calls for a more honest and less sanitized approach to Christian faith, one that embraces both the beauty and the messiness of encountering the divine. He challenges us to consider whether our worship reflects the raw, real, and sometimes “sloppy” reality of a life touched by God.
