The worship song “How He Loves” has resonated with countless individuals, becoming deeply personal for many. Originally penned by John Mark McMillan, the song gained further popularity through renditions by Kim Walker-Smith and David Crowder. However, Crowder’s version sparked controversy due to a lyrical change, replacing the phrase “sloppy wet kiss” with “reckless abandon.” This article delves into the story behind the alteration, exploring the reasoning and the ensuing debate surrounding David Crowder’s interpretation of “How He Loves.”
The Lyrical Change and Its Rationale
David Crowder, known for his thoughtful approach to worship music, approached John Mark McMillan seeking permission to modify the lyrics. Recognizing that the original phrasing might alienate certain audiences, Crowder aimed to make the song more accessible to a broader Christian demographic. McMillan, after deliberation, granted permission for the change. His respect for Crowder’s musical talent and ministry influenced his decision, trusting Crowder’s understanding of his audience. Crowder’s intention was to bridge a gap, ensuring the song’s message of God’s love reached listeners who might otherwise be turned off by the original wording.
John Mark McMillan’s Perspective
While McMillan supported Crowder’s decision, he expressed concern over the underlying reasons necessitating the change. He questioned why a phrase like “sloppy wet kiss,” intended to depict the messy yet beautiful intersection of heaven and earth, became a point of contention within Christian circles. McMillan challenged the notion that such imagery should be controversial, arguing that it reflects the raw and authentic nature of faith and life experiences, such as the birth of a child or the death of Christ – events simultaneously beautiful and messy. He advocated for a more genuine expression of faith, free from the constraints of perceived propriety.
Defending David Crowder
McMillan defended Crowder against criticism, emphasizing Crowder’s humility and integrity. He highlighted Crowder’s consistent acknowledgment of McMillan as the songwriter, a practice often overlooked in the music industry. Crowder’s transparency and willingness to credit the original artist underscored his respect for McMillan and the song’s origins. This act of giving credit demonstrated Crowder’s character and further validated his decision regarding the lyrical change. He made the change to serve his specific audience, not out of personal preference.
Misinterpretations and Clarifications
McMillan addressed common misinterpretations of the original lyrics, clarifying that the “sloppy wet kiss” was not intended to describe a physical interaction with God. Instead, it symbolized the messy yet beautiful collision of the divine and the human. He urged listeners to consider the broader context of the song, focusing on the overarching message of God’s unconditional love rather than fixating on a single phrase. This clarification aimed to redirect the conversation back to the song’s core meaning.
Conclusion: A Song’s Journey and Its Impact
The story of “How He Loves” exemplifies how a song can evolve and adapt while retaining its core message. David Crowder’s version, though different, stemmed from a desire to connect with his audience authentically. The ensuing controversy highlights the diverse interpretations and sensitivities within Christian culture. Ultimately, both versions of the song point toward the same profound truth: the immeasurable and unwavering love of God.
